List of 67 Important Cases Re Liens, Cases 41-43 | San Diego Injury Law Firm

41. Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. 126 S. Ct. 1869, 547 U.S. 356 (2006)
ERISA plan may enforce a subrogation or reimbursement provision through an action for constructive trust or equitable lien against a plan participant holding settlement funds. The Ct distinguished its 2002 ruling in Knudson, supra, on the basis that the ERISA plan there sued persons not holding the funds (which had been deposited in a Special Needs Trust). Also distinguished Knudson on the basis that instead of seeking to impose personal liability as in Knudson, the Sereboff action “sought its recovery through a constructive trust or equitable lien on a specifically Identified fund.” Id at 363. The Ct declined to decide the application of the "make whole" doctrine but suggested in dicta that said defense would not apply to an action for equitable lien. Ct did not address the common fund doctrine which had been applied by both lower courts because it was included in the reimbursement provision in the plan.

This case is inconsistent with all 9th Circuit precedent since 1994 holding that ERISA plans cannot enforce their contractual reimbursement provisions under ERISA because 29 USC 1132(a)(3) only allows plans to sue for "equitable relief to enforce the terms of the plan." Ct relies heavily on its 1914 decision in Barnes for the proposition that one promising to convey property to be recovered in the future becomes a constructive trustee “as soon as he recovers a title to the thing...” suggesting title argument.

 

41A. Popowski v. Parrott, 461 F.3d 1367 (11th Cir. 2006)

Recovery by 1 of 2 ERISA lienholders denied where plan failed to provide that reimbursement would be due from a particular fund, like the settlement proceeds. Under Sereboff, a general reimbursement obligation from the plan members assets is insufficient to support ERISA reimbursement.

 

42. Greer v. Buzgheia, 141 Cal.App.4th 1150 (2006)

A Hanif/Nishihama argument should be made post-trial so that the jury can assess the full measure of damages. Failure of the defense attorney bringing the motion to segregate past medical specials from past lost income in the special verdict form operates as a forfeiture of the right to bring such a motion if it would require the court to speculate as to the amount of medical expenses awarded by the jury.

 

43. Providence Health Plan v. Bush, 461 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2006)

In a post-Sereboff decision, district court in WA applies the make-whole rule as a complete defense to an ERISA reimbursement action, following 9th Cir. dec. in Barnes, supra. In post-trial hearing, ct awards $48K in attys fees to prevailing trustee and guardian of ERISA beneficiary. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10298.

 

Mark C. Blane is a San Diego Auto Accident Attorney, and the managing lawyer of the Law Offices of Mark C. Blane, a San Diego, California Personal Injury Law Firm devoted to representing families of injured persons of automobile accidents. If you or someone you love, has been injured or killed in San Diego County, or Southern California, due to the negligence of another, please order your FREE copy of Mr. Blane's book, The 10 Secrets You Need To Know About Your Injury Case, BEFORE You Call A Lawyer. It is full of helpful information, insights, and secrets that will help you protect your legal rights.  It normally sells for $16.95; however, it is free to all California residents, or those injured in a California accident.